• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Heather Mitchell-Buck

teaching, technology, & medieval stuff

  • Heather Mitchell-Buck
  • about me
    • Heather is…
    • cv
    • teaching
    • research
    • dossier
  • a 21st-century education
  • be proud to be human!
  • teaching with technology
    • tech in the classroom
    • inclusive teaching w/ technology
    • digital storytelling resources
    • online, hybrid, & bimodal teaching
    • teaching during major disruption
  • blog
  • student resources
    • general medieval info
    • old english & middle english
    • medieval feasting
    • history of english resources
    • writing & literary lingo
    • drama resources

ungrading

January 27, 2025 by Heather Mitchell-Buck Leave a Comment

self-graded final exams!

I think it’s fair to say that the word “exam” is NOT one of our students’ favorite words. Exams are usually high-pressure and high-stakes, they usually happen all piled on top of each other, and there’s rarely any wiggle room if they happen to come around when students aren’t feeling well or just having an off day.

a student standing with his back in a corner who is being covered by post-it notes with reminder messages on them
photo by Luis Villasmil on Unsplash

For all of these reasons and many more, I haven’t given an exam in years. But I tried an experiment last semester – a self-graded final “review activity” – and my students and I were really happy with the results. It’s based on the self-graded homework system I’ve used in my classes the past few years, as well as the general principles of collaborative evaluation (aka “ungrading”) that guide me as a teacher.

So if you’re looking for an alternative to a final exam that helps your students (and you!) see how much they’ve learned in your class, read on!

In my literature courses, I don’t ask my students many questions that have a “right” or “wrong” answer, but in other courses – like Old English or History of the English Language – each week’s material really does build on the knowledge gained in the previous weeks. It’s important for everyone to understand key points as we move along so that no one gets left behind. The same is true in our department’s Literary Theory course, which is where I used this self-graded exam. This course introduces students to a variety of schools of theory, and it’s important for students to feel solid on what one school “does” before moving onto the next so they don’t get all tangled up and discombobulated! And yes, there are lots of checkpoints along the way … but that’s not the point of this post! Let’s talk about that self-graded final exam already!


exam instructions

Here’s all the info for the exam, just as I gave to my students before their exam day:

Logistics:

  • You may do this on your own or will a small group (no more than 3 people total)
  • There will be two parts to this project.
    • Part 1 should be posted to Bb no later than Monday, 13 May at 2:30pm.
    • Part 2 should be posted to Bb on Monday, 13 May, between 3pm and midnight.

Part 1:

  • I will post a document on Wednesday, 8 May that includes several short (paragraph-length) readings of the same text. Each will represent one of the theoretical approaches we have discussed.
    • You DO NOT need to know anything about the plot or characters of the text in order to complete this activity, but you are welcome to look at a summary of the novel (eg Wikipedia, SparkNotes, GoodReads, etc) if you wish.
    • You may use your books, notes, and anything posted on our Bb site.
    • Please don’t turn to the interwebs because honestly that will make this harder, not easier! 😉
  • You will choose a selection of the readings and, for each, write a paragraph that identifies the type of theory/criticism and explains the elements of the reading that helped you identify which approach it is (key words/phrases, tone, etc.)
  • Plan to spend about 1.25 – 1.5 hrs on this part of the activity
  • Submit your work to Bb by Monday, 13 May at 2:30pm

Part 2:

  • I will post a document on Monday, 13 May at 3pm that correctly identifies each of the readings
  • You will use this to review your answers – see what you identified correctly and what you did not. For anything you got wrong, try to puzzle out which words, phrases, etc point you to the correct school of theory
  • Write a short reflection on the experience – how easy/challenging was it to identify the types of criticism? Which were harder than others, and why? How did this activity help to firm up your understanding of the differences and overlaps among these schools of theory?
  • Plan to spend about 1 hr on this part of the activity
  • Submit your work to Bb by Monday, 13 May, EOD (midnight).

a student on a black background smiling with arms upstreched and colorful confetti falling from above
photo by Ambreen Hasan on Unsplash

student feedback

What did my students think of this style of final exam? Here are just a few comments from the reflection part of the exam:

This activity made me feel more confident in my abilities … I thought that I would struggle a lot on this activity when it was introduced in class and was pleasantly surprised when I had a relatively easy time with it … I feel a lot better about how much I have learned in this class … Overall, I found the experience to be the least stressful final of the semester and a nice boost in confidence. Thank you!

This assignment was pretty thrilling. It helped reinforce what I knew and exposed what I didn’t know … Overall, this exercise was very enlightening and showed me just how much I still need to learn.

I found this activity really helped me feel confident in my understanding of the different schools of theory. I know we practiced them all in class … but seeing this many different types of readings for one text and identifying key [aspects] of each one solidified my … understandings of each type of theory … I think this activity helped me solidify my understanding of what we learned and be able to say that I know and understand each type of theory.

I genuinely believed throughout the semester that I had no grasp whatsoever of the subject matter. … Coming into this assignment, I was afraid that I wouldn’t be able to get any of these correct, so it shocked me a bit when I read through each paragraph and immediately understood where each was going.

This activity actually increased my confidence in the class material. I wasn’t exactly sure what to expect, but when I did part one … I felt fairly confident in all my answers. After checking them today, I saw they were all correct … I think this activity was helpful because it shows me how much I learned.

a victory!

I don’t know about y’all, but I’ve certainly never had an exam described as “pretty thrilling” before! The prevailing theme in my students’ reflection comments was that this exercise increased their confidence … and isn’t that what we all hope for at the end of a semester of learning? I’m definitely planning to use this kind of final exam again in the future, and I hope that you’ll give it a try too!

Filed Under: teaching Tagged With: collaborative evaluation, exams, learning, teaching, ungrading

March 9, 2021 by Heather Mitchell-Buck Leave a Comment

using self-graded tests & homework

our cat Maisie helping me work on Old English

An important aspect of “ungrading” for me in my Old English class this semester is giving students tests & homework that they grade themselves. I highly, highly recommend this strategy for any course that relies on tests, problem sets, translations, and other activities with “right” and “wrong” answers.

Here’s how this works for me

When I post a “test” on Blackboard, or assign an exercise/translation for homework, I give students the answers right away. They can check their work as they go, and then they submit their corrected work to me, along with whatever questions or comments they have about the process. This way, the students get instant feedback when they are focused on that assignment (rather than days later), and I don’t have to spend a bunch of time meticulously correcting mistakes – instead, I spend my time in conversation with the student about sticky points in their learning. It’s a much better use of everyone’s time. 🙂

Logistics for Blackboard tests

I create a “test” like normal, including feedback for incorrect answers (such as what page in the textbook they should review to see why they missed that question). Before deploying the test, choose “modify options” from the arrow next to the test title, and then in “show test results and feedback to students,” select all the checkboxes so that students can see their answer, the correct answer, and your feedback for any missed questions.

how to set up the “test” (click images to enlarge)

When the student takes the “test” (which is, of course 100% open-book, open-note for me), they get immediate feedback on what they missed and know exactly where to go to review the points they do not understand. All I need to do is review each test, see what was missed, and plan what we need to review either in individual conferences or as a whole class.

what students see as they review their answers
Logistics for language exercises & translations

I post an answer key (or my own translation of the passage they are working on) either at the same time as I post the assignment, or a couple of days later if I want them to have some time to work before seeing the answers. I encourage my students to work through all of the exercise or passage on their own before checking the answer key, but that is 100% on the honor system. I trust my students to do what’s best for their own learning, and we have lots of conversations about all the different ways they can choose to be accountable to themselves.

When the assignment is due, students upload their corrected work to Blackboard, including questions or comments that they would like for me to address. In my feedback to them, I answer their questions, provide help and examples, and so on.

sample student homework + questions

How it’s going

So far, I’m loving this system. I have very few classes in which my assignments have a “right” or “wrong” answer – I never quiz students on names of characters or authors or dates, for example. But when you’re teaching and learning a language, it’s important that everyone understands each step along the way so no one falls behind. Especially because this is a hybrid class that only meets once per week for 75 minutes, we can’t use our valuable class time “correcting” work, and I never, ever want students to have to wait for me to find out “how they did” on an assignment.

My students have told me that they appreciate this approach too. They feel empowered to find the answers they need and figure out the “whys” for themselves before asking me, and I can already see that they are retaining the material well and know exactly where to look up what they don’t know. not to mention that it’s a great feeling to see a question in the margin of a student’s work, and then a note next to that question saying, “Never mind! I figured it out for myself!!” 🙂

Filed Under: teaching Tagged With: hybrid teaching, online teaching, ungrading

July 1, 2020 by Heather Mitchell-Buck Leave a Comment

continued adventures in ungrading

The past academic year has been a challenge for all of us!

COVID-19 has had a devastating effect on our world and on our learning communities, which is not something ANY of us would have wanted. But as it has forced us to rethink the ways that we teach and learn, I’ve been getting more questions from colleagues and friends about my ungrading process. So I thought I would share this video of a talk I gave on my home campus, Hood College, last fall (back when we could all safely get together for an in-person conversation, which now seems like another lifetime, doesn’t it?).

And yes, I am still happily ungrading!

Slides

Filed Under: teaching, videos Tagged With: learning, teaching, ungrading

August 14, 2019 by Heather Mitchell-Buck Leave a Comment

adventures in ungrading

In the 2018-2019 academic year, I did not grade a single assignment or project.

No, I was not on sabbatical. I was ungrading.

a woman sits on a bed. her hair and books fly all around her. she looks free.
image by Pexels from Pixabay

what is ungrading?

I’ve struggled to come up with a pithy and accurate definition for myself. Here’s my best shot (for now, at least):

“Ungrading” is an attempt to focus our (both teachers’ and students’) attention on learning, rather than schooling:

  • to make process and progress as important as products…
  • and to actively involve students in the important task of reflecting on and evaluating their own work…
  • so that we can rethink the power hierarchies of the classroom…
  • in order to help our learning spaces become more open and equitable.

There are lots of folks out there who have more experience with this process than I do. If you’re not familiar with the basic idea of ungrading, please pause here and go read two blog posts by Jesse Stommel: “Why I Don’t Grade,” and “How to Ungrade.” (You can also check out the resources at the end of this post.)

OK, now that all that wisdom is tucked away inside your head, you’re ready to hear a bit about my experience. It’s a long post, so thanks in advance for your patience and interest! 😉

why did I do it?

There are so many reasons why I decided to make the switch to ungrading. I started my own undergraduate career at Hampshire College and I still believe in their system. Ultimately, it really boils down to this truth:

grades are the biggest and most insidious obstacle to education … [they] are currency for a capitalist system that reduces teaching and learning to a mere transaction. Grading is a massive co-ordinated effort to take humans out of the educational process.

— Jesse Stommel

In many ways, it wasn’t THAT big of a change for me. I’ve been practicing a lot of the philosophy behind ungrading in my classes for a long time now. I ask everyone to be a full human person in my classroom. I trust my students. I see myself as their co-learner. I encourage them to take as much agency in their learning as they can. I try to make the projects in my classes relevant and useful, rather than just disposable busywork that has no relation to the rest of their life. I don’t take attendance or police their screens or think of my class as the most important space they inhabit. I give lots of written comments on student work and I try to make those comments encouraging, conversational, and growth-oriented, rather than just corrective.

And it felt SO GOOD not to have to put that letter at the end of all of that feedback. I know that students are busy, and I get why they skip over the commentary and just look for the letter that they have been told determines their future and measures their worth. And for the students who do read my comments (oh so carefully!), it was a relief not to field the questions that arise when it seems the comments don’t align with the grade: “But you said all of these great things about my paper – why did it only get a B?” or “If I got an A, why did you have so many suggestions for how I could improve? Wasn’t my paper good?”

Y’all, this is one of the best things I have ever done as a teacher.

a woman with a brown umbrella jumps in front of a yellow plank wall
image by Edu Lauton on Unsplash

how did I do it?

The biggest question people have asked me about all of this (some with real interest, and some with a liberal helping of snark) is how did it work?

setup

Once I made the decision to ungrade, I jumped in with both feet. I implemented this in all four classes I taught last year (because I have administrative responsibilities, I am currently on a reduced teaching load; full-time faculty at Hood teach 21 credits per year, aka a 4-3 load). n.b. This may not be the wisest way to begin ungrading, especially if you are nervous about how it will go or face any kind of precarity in your employment situation. You can always start with a single class or even a single project and scale up from there.

My courses last year were a first-year seminar on fairy tales, an upper-level course primarily for English majors on the history and basic linguistics of the English language, a gen-ed course on medieval romance, and an upper-level English and honors seminar that explores utopia from Plato through the 21st century. So about as diverse a group of students as I ever teach.

On my syllabi, I’ve always had a section called “How do I earn my final grade?” that lists the projects and the grade breakdown and so forth. I added the following caveat at the top of this section:

This course is going to work a little differently than most of the others you’ve taken; you will receive extensive feedback from me on all of your projects, but—because much of the work we do in college (and in life) is invisible to the teachers (and bosses, and coworkers and so on) who only get to see your final product—YOU will be responsible for helping me evaluate your progress before any grades are recorded.

I know that this may feel weird or even a little anxiety-inducing for some of you. That’s OK. We’ll work through it together. As a start, here’s the work you’ll be responsible for completing this semester, and the extent to which each aspect will contribute to your final grade.

I also talked a lot with students about this in the early days of the class (and throughout the semester) and made sure that everyone had all the info they needed to know about how this was going to work before the end of the add/drop period.

projects & evaluations

In my four classes, I had a wide variety of different kinds of projects (I really don’t like the word “assignments,” but that’s a convo for another day) – everything from blog posts to videos, from Old English translations to sentence diagram homework, from essays to exams.

I accept (nearly) all student work electronically through our LMS. I set up every project to be graded “complete/incomplete” (though in Blackboard you are still required to associate point values with each assignment, so I still had to choose a number of points to associate with each project, which feels disingenuous to me).

I read and commented on projects as per usual, but with perhaps a greater freedom and a more conversational tone, as I knew that students would be providing their own commentary on the projects too. I marked all projects “complete” in Blackboard and uploaded my feedback as a PDF as I’ve always done.

At midterm and again at the end of the semester, I asked every student to write a self-evaluation by answering a series of questions. These varied a bit from class to class, but I always asked students to reflect on their greatest strengths and their biggest struggles ,as well as to share a bit about how they were making progress in their own learning and/or had made a contribution to others’ learning. I also asked for them to reflect briefly on their work on each project as well as on their engagement in the class. The questions were more directive for first-year students than for upper-level students, and if anyone would like to see examples of my self-eval questions, I’m very happy to share.

At midterm, I read and responded to their self-evaluations. This response included a note about where I thought they stood in terms of their overall project grade as well as their engagement grade (which is a key component of all of my classes), based on our shared reflections on their work. There was also quite a bit of one-on-one conferencing at this time of the semester, required in the FYS; highly encouraged in the other classes.

At the end of the semester, I asked each student at the end of their self-evaluation what grade they felt their work and engagement had earned in the course overall. These were largely honest and direct, sometimes raw, and occasionally much too self-deprecatory, especially among women and students of color, who are often accustomed to having their work and their voices undervalued. I, like others who practice ungrading, always reserve the privilege of recording an appropriate grade if a student’s self-grading is not spot-on, and that was done more often than when a student had been too harsh with herself and deserved a higher grade than she thought.

a woman's hair and red scarf blow in the breeze at sunset
image by Aditya Saxena on Unsplash

what were the results?

Of course we always want the results – did it pay off? I can, of course, compare my grade distribution reports to those from previous semesters, but this is neither the most helpful nor most revealing way of answering this question. Here are some qualitative, anecdotal results that I hope convince you that this was, in fact, super-duper worth it.

  • For the first time ever in a gen-ed class, I had not one single “low grade” at midterm – our collective agency and engagement in the process ensured that no one got left behind.
  • I saw no more and no fewer late or missing projects in my FYS than in previous semesters. However, the students who struggled with chronic deadline aversion were SO MUCH MORE AWARE of why this was a problem. They understood what opportunities they missed, and reflected on how important it was for them to turn things around in future semesters.
  • Students in my History of the English language class were much more confident in their Old English translations, phonetic transcriptions, and other activities that have previously been difficult for the highly-motivated and extremely risk-averse students who tend to enroll in this course. Because there was no risk of failure, they were more willing to tackle the unfamiliar.
  • Reading self-evaluations gave me a glimpse into my students’ lives and taught me about the barriers so many of our students face. I learned how to better honor what it means to be a student with a disability, a student who is a non-native English speaker, a first-generation college student, a student who has been told by her teachers that she can’t write, a student with too many family responsibilities, a student who can’t afford to put gas in her car to commute to school if she buys all of her textbooks, and so on. For these students especially, learning about and understanding their process was ESSENTIAL in evaluating their work – these are the students I believe are best-served by ungrading.
  • I had amazing conversations with students about the way that school and grades affect their physical and mental health – and was elated to see many of them recognize how much unnecessary power they had allowed grades to hold over their own self-worth and future hopes and dreams.

I could go on, but I’ve been sitting here writing this post for much too long and I need to do some concrete course planning for this fall before I’m allowed to call it a day!

tl;dr

My adventure in ungrading has been phenomenal for me thus far and I can also say with certainty that it has been eye-opening for my students. I absolutely plan to continue the experiment, and to do so with a critical mindset (e.g., I’m not convinced that “ungrading” is actually the best name for this process – I would prefer a positive term to a negative one, for a start!). I expect my process to change. I want my students to help me make it better. I look forward to sharing more with my colleagues and friends and to learning from their questions – both the positive and the skeptical.

To that end, if you’d like to chat about ungrading or teaching in general, please do reach out via email or social media or, if you’re local, over a glass of wine or cup of tea.

resources

Want to keep thinking about the whys of ungrading? Here are the recommended readings from Jesse Stommel’s DPL Toronto track:

  • Jesse Stommel, “Why I Don’t Grade” and “How to Ungrade” (both linked above as well)
  • Peter Elbow, “Ranking, Evaluating, and Liking: Sorting out Three Forms of Judgment”
  • Alfie Kohn, “The Case Against Grades” and “The Trouble with Rubrics”
  • Cathy N. Davidson, “How to Crowdsource Grading”
  • Soraya Chemaly, “All Teachers Should Be Trained To Overcome Their Hidden Biases”
  • Asao Inoue, Antiracist Writing Assessment Ecologies: Teaching and Assessing Writing for a Socially Just Future, whatever chapters seem useful to you, but definitely “Appendix A: English 160W’s Grading Contract”

And here are some great essays and blog posts where folks talk about their experience ungrading:

  • Maha Bali, “Ungrading my class – reflections on a second iteration” and also this blog post on her 4th semester of ungrading
  • Clarissa Sorenson-Unruh, “Ungrading: a series (part 1)”
  • Colleen Flaherty, “When grading less is more”
  • Laura Gibbs, “(Un)grading: it can be done in college”

And of course you can always check out #ungrading on Twitter.

Filed Under: teaching Tagged With: learning, ungrading

Primary Sidebar

Heather is…

…an Associate Professor of English at Hood College

…an Apple Distinguished Educator

…a humanities advocate

…a taiko player

…a tea drinker

…a fan.

Recent Posts

  • color your classes: low- and no-tech college projects
  • self-graded final exams!
  • in the age of AI, be human
  • the beauty of short video projects
  • keeping the backchannel going!

Tags

AI architecture assignments backchannel birthdays chat ChatGPT collaborative evaluation college conferences content organization discussions DPL2018 DPL2019 encouragement England Trip exams funny gif Hood College how-to humanities hybrid teaching iPad iPad stuff learning liberal arts literature medieval medieval churches more than just an academic online teaching open pedagogy projects Shakespeare St. Martin-cum-Gregory success teaching technology ungrading video vlog what I'm reading York York Minster

Categories

  • digital storytelling
  • more than just an academic
  • research
  • teaching
  • videos
  • website

Find Stuff…

Footer

Find Stuff …

Find Me …

  • Bluesky
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Flickr
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
CC-BY
Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Handcrafted with ♥ on the Genesis Framework · by TerryBuckArt