• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Heather Mitchell-Buck

teaching, technology, & medieval stuff

  • Heather Mitchell-Buck
  • about me
    • Heather is…
    • cv
    • teaching
    • research
    • dossier
  • a 21st-century education
  • be proud to be human!
  • teaching with technology
    • tech in the classroom
    • inclusive teaching w/ technology
    • digital storytelling resources
    • online, hybrid, & bimodal teaching
    • teaching during major disruption
  • blog
  • student resources
    • general medieval info
    • old english & middle english
    • medieval feasting
    • history of english resources
    • writing & literary lingo
    • drama resources

Heather Mitchell-Buck

November 14, 2025 by Heather Mitchell-Buck Leave a Comment

color your classes: low- and no-tech college projects

Anyone who’s met me knows that I love to help students and their professors make the most of technology as part of our teaching and learning. But especially now, with Generative “AI” sneaking into every facet of our lives, many of us are craving a little more simplicity, a little more genuine humanity, and a little more time away from our screens.

So here are a few ways that I’m encouraging students to close their laptops and put themselves into “Do Not Disturb” mode in my classes, plus some additional resources to help you bring some low-tech time into your classes!

a close up of colored pencils
photo by Megan Lee on Unsplash

discussion formats

The majority of my class time is discussion. Usually, we follow a pretty standard format:

  1. students start off class with a short writing prompt (I call this “Daily Quotes & Questions”) so they can bring themselves present and think about the reading or other work they did prior to coming to class;
  2. students have a small group conversation to ensure everyone is able to share their thoughts with one another;
  3. we move into a full-class discussion, usually with some guiding questions that I’ve prepared in advance and/or based on what they wrote about in their DQQ writing.

However, sometimes it’s good to mix it up, and that often involves having students close their laptops and try a different mode for discussion. Here are two of my favorites:

speed dating convos
  1. I generate a set of questions that are optimal for short chats or brainstorming and put them on a slide;
  2. students move their desks to the sides of the room;
  3. everyone chooses a partner to discuss the first question and I set a timer for 2-3 minutes;
  4. repeat step 3 with new partners for each question … or even have the same conversation with multiple partners if that’s helpful for the material (eg when it’s about opinions / analysis of something we read);
  5. every couple of questions, ask people to share something insightful one of their partners said to be sure that the whole group can benefit and students can lift up each others’ voices.
group-facilitated discussion

This is especially helpful if you are discussing a hard or hot-button topic and/or if you have a few eager voices who tend to be more generous with talking than listening. Sometimes I do this with a set of questions displayed on a slide; sometimes not.

  1. desks are set up in a circle – it’s important for this for everyone to be able to see everyone else and that no one can hide;
  2. I start off the conversation and then ask anyone who’d like to speak next to raise their hand. I choose someone whose hand is raised to go next;
  3. each person who speaks chooses who will speak after them;
  4. two different people must speak before someone can be called on again (this prevents someone from talking and then immediately responding to someone who responded to them)
  5. everyone is STRONGLY encouraged to contribute to the conversation at least once, and everyone does their best to call on people who have had less to say in the course of the conversation so we can do our best to hear from everyone.

Both of these are great ways for students to really connect to each other and to the content we’re discussing. It requires everyone to listen and to do their part to keep conversation moving. Are there sometimes awkward silences? Yes, of course. Are there sometimes people who haven’t done the reading and aren’t able to participate? Yes, again – sometimes I ask those people to self-identify to me and give them a specific job, like listening to the “speed dating” convos and reporting back on smart things they heard others say, etc.

photo by Metis Designer on Unsplash

knowledge checks & content reviews

I don’t give exams, but I do want to be sure my students are accountable for the content that we cover, and analog options are often best for this.

Please note that it’s important to be aware of students’ accommodations before requiring handwritten work. I never want some students in the class to be singled out by their technology use, so I only do these kinds of things after a private dialogue with any students whose accommodations indicate that the student needs a computer for their written work.

Here’s a sampling of in-class activities to achieve this:

  • notecard checks:
    this can be a simple “quiz” at the start of class or an exit survey-type activity. Students respond to a specific question in writing, on a notecard that only I see. Depending on the purpose, you can decide if students should or shouldn’t put their names on the notecard.
  • notecard circulation:
    kind of like a written version of the speed-dating convos above, this asks students to share their thoughts on a question and then the notecards are shuffled around and everyone looks at a few to get a sense of what their colleagues are thinking
  • collaborative close reading:
    this is great not just in literature classes! It can work with any complex material. Check out the detailed instructions from Danica Savonick by clicking the link above! You definitely need colored pencils, pens, and highlighters for this one.
  • analog journaling:
    I haven’t done this in awhile but I am thinking about bringing it back next semester in one of my classes with a reading journal project. I hope to be able to report back on that in the spring!
mid-semester review

I often do a mid-semester content review – just a simple set of slides with multiple-choice questions that should be easy to answer correctly for those who’ve been keeping up with the reading. I do this in teams and usually give out crayons and coloring pages. Midterm is a stressful time for students – they’ve usually been staring at their laptops and study guides for hours on end and they honestly welcome the chance to relive a bit of their childhood. But even more importantly, what I’ve found is that the coloring helps them focus and have a great discussion about what they knew and what they missed – they can look at their coloring page instead of having to look their colleagues in the class in the eye when they say they don’t know an answer and so everyone has a better experience overall. And yes, I give out gold stars to everyone at the end. You’d be surprised at the motivating power of a gold star sticker!

In my medieval lit classes, I often use a giant “gameboard” that looks like a castle, with each team of knights represented by a different color shield. Having any kind of props like this really helps everyone relax and learn.

foam board castle designed by Heather MB & Terry Buck

more ideas!

There are LOADS of great projects out there … I know all of you have great ideas too. I’ve been really inspired lately by the Against AI site and the many assignment ideas found there – I hope you are too!

What are some of your fave ideas for getting students away from their screens and connecting to each other?

Filed Under: teaching

January 27, 2025 by Heather Mitchell-Buck Leave a Comment

self-graded final exams!

I think it’s fair to say that the word “exam” is NOT one of our students’ favorite words. Exams are usually high-pressure and high-stakes, they usually happen all piled on top of each other, and there’s rarely any wiggle room if they happen to come around when students aren’t feeling well or just having an off day.

a student standing with his back in a corner who is being covered by post-it notes with reminder messages on them
photo by Luis Villasmil on Unsplash

For all of these reasons and many more, I haven’t given an exam in years. But I tried an experiment last semester – a self-graded final “review activity” – and my students and I were really happy with the results. It’s based on the self-graded homework system I’ve used in my classes the past few years, as well as the general principles of collaborative evaluation (aka “ungrading”) that guide me as a teacher.

So if you’re looking for an alternative to a final exam that helps your students (and you!) see how much they’ve learned in your class, read on!

In my literature courses, I don’t ask my students many questions that have a “right” or “wrong” answer, but in other courses – like Old English or History of the English Language – each week’s material really does build on the knowledge gained in the previous weeks. It’s important for everyone to understand key points as we move along so that no one gets left behind. The same is true in our department’s Literary Theory course, which is where I used this self-graded exam. This course introduces students to a variety of schools of theory, and it’s important for students to feel solid on what one school “does” before moving onto the next so they don’t get all tangled up and discombobulated! And yes, there are lots of checkpoints along the way … but that’s not the point of this post! Let’s talk about that self-graded final exam already!


exam instructions

Here’s all the info for the exam, just as I gave to my students before their exam day:

Logistics:

  • You may do this on your own or will a small group (no more than 3 people total)
  • There will be two parts to this project.
    • Part 1 should be posted to Bb no later than Monday, 13 May at 2:30pm.
    • Part 2 should be posted to Bb on Monday, 13 May, between 3pm and midnight.

Part 1:

  • I will post a document on Wednesday, 8 May that includes several short (paragraph-length) readings of the same text. Each will represent one of the theoretical approaches we have discussed.
    • You DO NOT need to know anything about the plot or characters of the text in order to complete this activity, but you are welcome to look at a summary of the novel (eg Wikipedia, SparkNotes, GoodReads, etc) if you wish.
    • You may use your books, notes, and anything posted on our Bb site.
    • Please don’t turn to the interwebs because honestly that will make this harder, not easier! 😉
  • You will choose a selection of the readings and, for each, write a paragraph that identifies the type of theory/criticism and explains the elements of the reading that helped you identify which approach it is (key words/phrases, tone, etc.)
  • Plan to spend about 1.25 – 1.5 hrs on this part of the activity
  • Submit your work to Bb by Monday, 13 May at 2:30pm

Part 2:

  • I will post a document on Monday, 13 May at 3pm that correctly identifies each of the readings
  • You will use this to review your answers – see what you identified correctly and what you did not. For anything you got wrong, try to puzzle out which words, phrases, etc point you to the correct school of theory
  • Write a short reflection on the experience – how easy/challenging was it to identify the types of criticism? Which were harder than others, and why? How did this activity help to firm up your understanding of the differences and overlaps among these schools of theory?
  • Plan to spend about 1 hr on this part of the activity
  • Submit your work to Bb by Monday, 13 May, EOD (midnight).

a student on a black background smiling with arms upstreched and colorful confetti falling from above
photo by Ambreen Hasan on Unsplash

student feedback

What did my students think of this style of final exam? Here are just a few comments from the reflection part of the exam:

This activity made me feel more confident in my abilities … I thought that I would struggle a lot on this activity when it was introduced in class and was pleasantly surprised when I had a relatively easy time with it … I feel a lot better about how much I have learned in this class … Overall, I found the experience to be the least stressful final of the semester and a nice boost in confidence. Thank you!

This assignment was pretty thrilling. It helped reinforce what I knew and exposed what I didn’t know … Overall, this exercise was very enlightening and showed me just how much I still need to learn.

I found this activity really helped me feel confident in my understanding of the different schools of theory. I know we practiced them all in class … but seeing this many different types of readings for one text and identifying key [aspects] of each one solidified my … understandings of each type of theory … I think this activity helped me solidify my understanding of what we learned and be able to say that I know and understand each type of theory.

I genuinely believed throughout the semester that I had no grasp whatsoever of the subject matter. … Coming into this assignment, I was afraid that I wouldn’t be able to get any of these correct, so it shocked me a bit when I read through each paragraph and immediately understood where each was going.

This activity actually increased my confidence in the class material. I wasn’t exactly sure what to expect, but when I did part one … I felt fairly confident in all my answers. After checking them today, I saw they were all correct … I think this activity was helpful because it shows me how much I learned.

a victory!

I don’t know about y’all, but I’ve certainly never had an exam described as “pretty thrilling” before! The prevailing theme in my students’ reflection comments was that this exercise increased their confidence … and isn’t that what we all hope for at the end of a semester of learning? I’m definitely planning to use this kind of final exam again in the future, and I hope that you’ll give it a try too!

Filed Under: teaching Tagged With: collaborative evaluation, exams, learning, teaching, ungrading

August 9, 2023 by Heather Mitchell-Buck Leave a Comment

in the age of AI, be human

image by Brett Jordan on Unsplash

A new academic year is upon us! As we prepare for the year, many professors and teachers (and students too!) are concerned about the pervasiveness and seeming inevitability of AI tools in our classrooms. Some teachers are trying to come up with “cheat proof” tests; others are drafting assignments that are meant to teach students the limits of ChatGPT and its ilk.

I think the solution is, and should be, simpler. After all, it feels a bit … disingenuous to me to try to find a cheat or a workaround for something that is designed to be a cheat and a workaround. So if you’d like to help your students learn to trust their own voices and minimize the role of AI-generated content in your classes this semester, read on!

I’ve had a few instances of ChatGPT surfacing in my classes – yes, in MY classes, where I famously do not grade papers. As always, I dreaded the task of sitting down with the students who had violated our college’s honor code – but honestly, these cases all ended up being positive conversations and excellent learning experiences, both for the students and for me, and they’ve helped me hone and focus my approach for how I want to help students handle the allure of AI tools as they return to college in just a couple of short weeks.

trusting students

Always my mantra: trust students. Talk to them. We are all human beings. We are all imperfect. We all get stressed and overwhelmed. We all procrastinate (well, if you don’t, then GOOD for you, but honestly I am not sure I can learn your ways!). We all, occasionally, look for an easy way out – whether it’s ordering pizza on a night that you had planned to cook a nice meal, or turning to an AI tool for inspo on your English paper.

My conversations with students who’ve turned to ChatGPT – or, in a similar instance, who’ve relied on SparkNotes, Shmoop, or similar sources and then so overly-Grammarly’d their papers so that they ended up sounding like they’d used ChatGPT – have all ended up positive because my goal was not to “catch” them or get them to “admit” anything. Instead, my goal was to find the root cause:

  • What’s going on in your life?
  • How busy are you?
  • How many projects did you have due this week?
  • Why are you anxious about trusting in yourself and believe in the power of your own voice?

We were able to talk, human to human. The students have thanked me – as in, “wow, this has really been weighing on me and I’m glad you gave me the opportunity to be honest about what I did.” And the work they have submitted after our conversations have been honest and genuine – papers that I was pleased to read and evaluate and return to the students with positive comments.

image by Brett Jordan on Unsplash

moving forward

So how have these situations helped me with my own “ChatGPT strategy” for the next academic year? I’ve decided to get more proactive about this conversation with ALL of my students, rather than having individual talks once an honor code violation to pop up.

In the age of AI, where too much content sounds vague and bland, students need to be colorful. They need to be sincere, to be genuinely themselves. This is how they are going to stand out on the job market. Employers want teamwork, critical and creative thinking, problem solving, and other skills that AI just can’t handle.

So how are we going to practice that in my classes? I’m a big believer in the advantages of having technology in the classroom, but I also believe that there are times we should aim to work in analog. Brainstorming sessions on chalkboards. Mini quizzes and idea generation on index cards. Skits. Yes, SKITS. (We all roll our eyes at the idea, but we usually end up giggling and being genuinely, humanly silly in a skit!) And yes, all of these ideas can be adapted to meet the needs of ANY student with different learning challenges or physical needs.

I’m also going to require students to cite all online or AI tools they use – including ChatGPT, Grammarly, Zotero, etc – to help them recognize and acknowledge the ways that those tools are a part of their work and education. I will not judge them for turning to these tools – though I will encourage them to try flying without those nets. I want them to learn, to be curious, to engage, not to feel shamed or anxious.

These are just a few things I plan to try, but the most important item on my anti-ChatGPT strategy list is to ask students for THEIR ideas. How can we use our class time to build our human skills, as well as our knowledge base? What kinds of human work can we do, and how can we – should we – evaluate that work? This is the cornerstone of the collaborative evaluation process that I use in my classes. I do of course evaluate their work, but I expect them to do their part too, because in the end, they’re the only ones who truly know how much and how well they are learning.

Hey, what do you know? I’m actually looking forward to this!

Filed Under: teaching Tagged With: AI, ChatGPT, learning, more than just an academic, teaching, technology

April 12, 2022 by Heather Mitchell-Buck Leave a Comment

the beauty of short video projects

a movie clap board
by Jakob Owens on Unsplash

why videos?

I’ve long been an advocate for using something OTHER than an exam as the cumulative assessment at the end of a semester. For me, the end of a course is when students should be working at the top of Bloom’s Taxonomy: analyzing, evaluating, and creating. There are all kinds of different projects that help students practice those skills, but one of my favorites is asking students to create a short, YouTube-friendly video.

Being able to effectively present material to others is something every student needs, regardless of their chosen career path. I want students to be able to distill down complex ideas and present them in a concise, direct, personable way. A short video is perfect for that, and in the era of smartphones and Zoom, anyone can make a half-decent video (obvs I don’t teach video production, ha!).

So what kind of content do my students present in these videos? It depends on the class! The sky’s the limit in terms of options: I’ve had students make “explainer” videos, “day in the life” videos, and more, all of which can easily be adapted to fit the needs of all kinds of courses. For example, in my gen ed class on King Arthur, I ask students to dream up an idea for a new version of King Arthur; figure out how to develop that idea as a movie, book, TV show, video game, comic book, etc; and pitch it to the execs with the power to decide whether or not their project gets a green light. This requires them to think about all the previous versions of the Round Table we’ve read and watched, think about what made them appealing to their audiences, and decide what audiences today need from the “Once and Future King.” In my “Exploring Utopia” class, which is an upper-level class for English majors and honors students, I ask students to design their own utopia and create a PR campaign video to encourage others to give their utopia a try (either as a short-term visit or a long-term lifestyle). After spending a semester thinking about how utopias as varied as Plato’s Republic and Andrew Niccol’s GATTACA work to balance the elements of justice, happiness, individuality and community, I can’t think of a better way to think about all of those elements of society than to try out that balancing act for yourself.

a few logistics:

  • This can easily be done as an individual or group project
  • Videos should be short: about 5 minutes is usually ideal
  • They can be as simple as the student talking to the camera, or can include images, slides, music, etc. (I always remind students to prioritize content over production value, and often the “cheesiest” videos end up the most successful!)
  • Finished videos are uploaded to the cloud storage of the student’s choice (Dropbox, OneDrive, Google Drive, etc) or as an unlisted (not private!) YouTube video
  • I often also have a written component, which requires students to go into greater depth -this helps them recognize what the MOST important details are (the “elevator pitch,” so to speak) and use them in their video

I really enjoy watching these videos at the end of the semester – it’s fun to see my students get creative and figure out new ways to approach the material we’ve been thinking about all semester, while ALSO building real-world skills they can use in their life after college! (And yes, it’s way, way more fun that reading – or taking – exams!)

Filed Under: digital storytelling, teaching Tagged With: assignments, projects, technology, video

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 14
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Heather is…

…an Associate Professor of English at Hood College

…an Apple Distinguished Educator

…a humanities advocate

…a taiko player

…a tea drinker

…a fan.

Recent Posts

  • color your classes: low- and no-tech college projects
  • self-graded final exams!
  • in the age of AI, be human
  • the beauty of short video projects
  • keeping the backchannel going!

Tags

AI architecture assignments backchannel birthdays chat ChatGPT collaborative evaluation college conferences content organization discussions DPL2018 DPL2019 encouragement England Trip exams funny gif Hood College how-to humanities hybrid teaching iPad iPad stuff learning liberal arts literature medieval medieval churches more than just an academic online teaching open pedagogy projects Shakespeare St. Martin-cum-Gregory success teaching technology ungrading video vlog what I'm reading York York Minster

Categories

  • digital storytelling
  • more than just an academic
  • research
  • teaching
  • videos
  • website

Find Stuff…

Footer

Find Stuff …

Find Me …

  • Bluesky
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Flickr
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
CC-BY
Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Handcrafted with ♥ on the Genesis Framework · by TerryBuckArt